2006-05-11

A Prediction (Automotive Trends)



I was listening to an NPR call-in show about the current spike in gasoline prices, and one caller pointed out the bind of the lower-middle class Americans. They are typically stuck with beater cars/pickup trucks with horrible mileage, and they are spending a greater proportion of their income on gasoline, so therefore they are getting hit disproportionately harder. It got me thinking: with gasoline prices getting worse, the market for small, fuel efficient, and—most importantly--inexpensive cars is going to open up in a big way.

I have talked about the falling sales of SUVs in my earlier rant about US automakers; it was also pointed out in the New York Times article "U.S. Makers Facing Glut of S.U.V.'s as Gas Rises" (May 3, 2006): Americans shied away from large sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks in April as gas prices approached $3 a gallon. With a battery of new S.U.V.'s waiting in the wings, domestic automakers are now facing the very situation they had hoped to avoid.

The latest surge in gas prices poses a long-term problem for the domestic auto companies, which had been hoping that gas prices would moderate and make S.U.V. sales easier. Now, analysts warn it may be harder to get consumers to buy a gas-thirsty vehicle when the oil market remains so volatile.


If I had a "Quote-a-Day Emperor Palpatine Calendar" (on sale at your local Imperial Bookstore), it would be saying: "You have paid the price for your lack of vision." [insert lightning bolts from fingertips here].

The Japanese manufacturers seem to be ahead of the curve once again: not just with hybrids, but also compacts that still have a decent level of styling, fit, and finish (as opposed to "this is the bottom of our line, and we are treating it as such")—e.g., the Honda Fit and Toyota VarisYaris.

But more importantly, I don't know how much my readers have been following stories of the Chinese producing automobiles for sale overseas (Europe, and soon the U.S.)—it is something that I have tracked. Remember: these are the guys who can undercut the Koreans on price at a comparable quality level. Basically, they will be able to manufacture cars at the WalMart price point.

Detroit sees this on the horizon: whether or not they can do anything about it is another question (NYT "See the U.S.A. in Your New Car From China, Starting in '07", January 10, 2006):

It does not matter that Geely, the Chinese carmaker getting a lot of attention at the auto show here, has yet to sell a single car in the United States. It is the possibility it could that has Detroit talking.

"I think it's the beginning, the very beginning, of Chinese international participation in the U.S.," said Robert A. Lutz, General Motors' vice chairman and product development chief. "A few years down the road, sure, it'd be foolish not to see it as a threat."

Geely (pronounced JEE-lee) does not have a model that meets United States safety and environmental regulations, but the company said it was working on a small four-door sedan that it could sell here for less than $10,000.

Under the best of circumstances, it would be more than two years before a Geely is sold in the United States. The company plans to sell a model first in Puerto Rico, where it has signed a contract with one dealer, in the spring of 2008. Geely hopes to move into the United States later that year.

But Geely will probably not be the first Chinese automaker to take on the American market. A rival, Chery Automotive, has already announced plans to begin shipping cars to the United States in 2007.


My prediction is that if the price of gas continues to rise, the market for small, fuel-efficient, inexpensive cars will be something that the Chinese will be able to capitalize on, to the detriment of the Big Three.

To wit, the Atlantic Monthly article Countdown to a Meltdown (full text available online!—strongly recommended) had an interesting anecdote in their possible future timeline of the United States economy that resonates strongly here:

Toyota's acquisition of General Motors and Ford, in 2012, had a similar inevitability. Over the previous decade the two U.S. companies had lost money on every car they sold. Such profit as they made was on SUVs, trucks, and Hummer-style big rigs. In 2008, just before the oil shock, GM seemed to have struck gold with the Strykette—an adaptation of the Army's Stryker vehicle, so famous from Iraq and Pakistan, whose marketing campaign attracted professional women. Then the SUV market simply disappeared. With gasoline at $6 a gallon, the prime interest rate at 15 percent, and the stock and housing markets in the toilet, no one wanted what American car makers could sell. The weak dollar, and their weak stock prices, made the companies a bargain for Toyota.

6 Comments:

At 1:44 PM, Blogger dan said...

I really think that the good compromise for people who want to buy North American cars is to buy a Civic or a Corolla or a Matrix, or any of the other Honda or Toyota cars built in Ontario or the US.

And, having driven a Sonata lately, I can assert that it was also a much nicer car than any of the Chevies and Fords I've had in years, including the Chevy Kobold I had a couple months back.

I really think it's a one-way street: do non-Big 3 owners ever buy a Big 3 car again, except under financial duress?

 
At 7:22 PM, Blogger Smartcar Owner said...

those are ugly rims inthe pic..ppl take it too far..anyways check out for chery and geely, they will be in canada soon ;)

http://www.chinacarforums.com

 
At 9:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

psst, it's a Yaris. :)

While I'm happy with my Echo, the fit and finish and quality that's present in, say, my parents' Buick Century just isn't there. It's noisy, some of the bits rattle, and the whole interior screams "CHEAP". The Echo was the bottom of Toyota's line, and... it was treated as such. I don't expect the Yaris is a whole lot different.

That being said, it's comparable to the Sunfire a friend of mine bought, and it was at least a couple thousand dollars cheaper (and came stock with an MP3/CD player, while I think he had to add his). The Aveo was at a similar price point, but Chevy wanted $400 to add the CD player. I expect the fit & finish to be similar in the Chev.

 
At 9:31 AM, Blogger Bats said...

psst, it's a Yaris. :)

Oops. Thanks--fixed.

My impression that these new subcompacts have higher quality was just based on reading newspaper and online reviews:

"This replacement for the unloved Toyota Echo boasts the good looks, suave road manners, perky performance and well-tailored interior that establish new benchmarks in the entry-level game....Despite being the least expensive Toyota-badged car sold in America, the Yaris boasts generous standard equipment and interiors that appear to be tailored for more expensive models."

However, I have no personal experience with these new compacts--I can not say anything about the quality of these cars firsthand.

 
At 9:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

The automatic Echo is utterly gutless. It drives well in town; wouldn't want it on the highway, especially the 401. Our Echo is a 5 speed, it did pretty well last summer on the highways in Vermont (lots of hills), New Hampshire (Live Free Or Die, we chose to drive as quickly as possible through before we were either kidnapped or shot), Maine (construction ahead signs are superfluous), Quebec (chalise estee le tabernacle they're crazy), New Brunswick (stop signs at the end of a merge lane onto a 100km/h highway), and Nova Scotia (like Maine except the limit is 110).

The Yaris's specs mirror the Echo's, so I expect it'll be the same drive.

These are very tall cars, which combined with their small size means at highway speeds, wind shear turns them into kites. Not necessarily dangerous, but it can be startling and you have to watch it when passing or being passed by big trucks especially, and freak gusts of wind are a challenge.

The standard 13" wheels are pretty nasty in the winter, my RWD Mustang with crappy all-weathers and a tendency to stall at low speeds did better in the winter.

Oh, they're also *extremely* uncomfortable with 4 adults for any period of time. Thankfully, our road trip was 2 adults and one relatively well behaved child.

The standard equipment is, indeed, nice - we didn't have to add any options, and a/c was a $1000 option (that we declined).

While I wouldn't trade my Echo for anything else (except maybe an Accord or Corolla), these cars are not the panacea beloved of bloggers everywhere. They have some serious flaws of which buyers should be aware, just like any other vehicle. If good gas consumption is high priority, you won't find much better outside of a hybrid, and if, like us, your biggest need is casual transport of two adults and/or a child in-town, and grocery shopping and the very occasional road trip, it's perfect.

Hopefully I saved some commas for somebody else in case they needed them.

 
At 5:19 PM, Blogger Smartcar Owner said...

well said mikep ..i tottally agree

http://www.chinacarforums.com

 

Post a Comment

<< Home